An attempt to comfort the viewer tired of abstract painting.

Quite often the reaction of the viewer standing in front of the painting is searching for references to real reality in an abstract form. As if apart from what you can see, there were no emotions, imagination, intuitions and all the complexity of human existence. Realistic imaging depicts a theme from real reality, the one we can see or the one we cannot see (dreams, surrealism, symbolism).

 

Piet Mondrian, Still life with a jar of ginger II

Contrary to appearances, this problem looks similar in relation to the abstract form of imaging. Abstract painting often has its source in the real world that surrounds us, the one we register with our sight. It processes it down to abstract values ​​and signs. It also uses reality existing outside our sense of sight (e.g. feelings, emotions, everything that happens in the human psyche) giving him a real artistic sign. Sometimes it is a sign of exploration within the limits of the painting form itself. However, most works of art originate from the artist's experience of real reality and reality perceived by senses other than the sense of sight.

In my paintings, I try to explore the border between real reality and an abstract artistic sign. How to reduce the difference and the border dividing the real world and the world of abstraction, the material world and the world of other values? Are the world perceived abstractly and the world perceived realistically really antagonistic in art?

Kazimierz Ratajczak, Fever comes at night (oil, canvas, 140 x 195 cm)

After this confession of artistic credo, I would like to return to our viewer of art, who in the painting, in art, is looking for familiar realistic representations or anecdotes and, as he often says, "I do not understand" other painting. Is it really so that the average viewer of art is not able to "understand" abstract painting? I will quote here Picasso's statement from Brassai's Conversations with Piccas: "How can you get into my dreams, know my instincts, penetrate my desires, my thoughts that have cooperated together to appear one day - especially if someone wants to capture what was in the picture may be against my will. ", or a quote from Georges Braque:" The goal is not to be concerned with the reconstitution of an anecdotal fact, but with the constitution of a pictorial fact. However, I know that these quotes give food for thought, but will they convince the viewer tired of the abstract picture?

Wassily Kandinsky, 1913, Composition 6

Maybe one day I will continua this topic. For now, I give only such a tip, let your imagination and emotions run free, do not let yourself be deprived of something unusual. Don't try to understand. You listen to music without words and you also experience something extraordinary and touching. Try to look at the picture and become the creative of your own perception. At the beginning it is enough, and then maybe you will get to know the world and experience unusual emotions.

I don't know if I managed to convince you, but at least I tried. Maybe this entry will not go by the board?


 

 

 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Earth

One afternoon

Stefan Bech's woodcuts